![]() |
|
|
|
Item: Kid Action, 9" Action Figure Manufacturer: Playing Mantis Distributor: Diamond Comic Distributors, Inc List Price: 19.99 each Review by: Daniel Webster Overall Rating: Introduction:
The Review:
Once you get that box open you will do a double take (figure 3). How often does something inside the box look better than the picture on the front? Kid Action looks great! The face paint is top notch (figure 4) The emblem is vivid and printed on a metal backing (figure 5). The uniform is a faithful recreation, down to the vinyl shorts and metal snaps on the back (figure 6) The boots even have yellow lightning bolts painted on the front (figure 7). Very nice touches. Playing Mantis has gone the extra mile here and it shows. He comes with a bevy of accessories, including a black panther with a painted face and leash (figure 8). The boomerang, knife, belt and the obligatory beret are all present (figure 9). The accessories are faithful to the originals, and look great. For overall presentation value this figure gets perfect scores. Now lets take a look at playability. His joints are a bit stiff, as most new figures from this series are. Especially in the wrists, which I am unable to turn at all for fear of tearing his hands off. The elbows too, turn them at your own risk. His shoulders and knees were looser (quite loose on mine) but they hold a pose well, and while the swivel at the elbow was tight, the bend of the elbow was fine. So I tried out a few poses, and while I didn't get to 1001, I did manage to find a few that did him justice alongside the Captain. The hands seem a bit small, but he holds his accessories very well, and decked out in full regalia he looks spectacular (figure 10 and figure 11). One thing I noticed was that his head doesn't quite sit right. I spoke with a few other people who said the same thing about their heads (the one's on their Kid Action figures of course). I tried straightening it out but it always snapped back to a slightly cocked back position. Not a big deal. Its due to the way in which the neck post is terminated. Instead of a "ball" type ending which would allow a greater range of motion, it is a conical shape which is better suited for rotating than tilting. Other interesting points are that the torso is not a single piece, it is two halves snapped together. I have no idea why this was done, but it doesn't detract from the figure (although it is a slightly different plastic from the rest of the body). Another thing I want to mention, since there has been so much buzz about it, is his height. Yes, as was reported, he is definitely a little shorter than Ideal's Action Boy. Somewhere in the 1/4 inch range. He is not an Action Jackson, he is just slightly shorter than Action Boy. His legs are a little shorter, but the main reason for the height difference is the midsection. The opening where the torso fits into the midsection is large and the torso drops down a bit, accounting for some height loss. The same is true for the lower portion where the legs sit, the hole are big and the legs fit in deeply. This also accounts for some minor restriction of the leg movement. The big question is "Will he still accommodate a vintage uniform set?" The answer is a resounding yes. The height difference is minor and he fits well into the Ideal uniforms. The masks fit fine as well. If you are looking for a figure to display a loose vintage Action Boy uniform set, this is a great way to go (especially if you don't want to spend almost two hundred bucks on a figure) In Conclusion:
Daniel Webster April 2000 For a comparison
of Kid Action and Action Boy, take a look here: Kid
Action Meets Action Boy
|
|
|
|
|